Perineuronal nets are a molecular prison for adult neurons—and dismantling them could reopen the critical period for recovery after spinal cord injury
This infographic illustrates how spinal cord injury leads to the formation of glial scars and perineuronal nets (PNNs) containing CSPGs, which block axon regrowth and synaptic rewiring. Therapeutic intervention aims to dismantle these PNNs, reopening the critical period for neural plasticity and improving recovery.
After CNS injury, scar tissue forms. We have known for decades that glial scars block axon regrowth. But the mechanism is more specific than general scar tissue: it is chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs) in the extracellular matrix that physically halt growth cones. And CSPGs do not just sit in scars—they form perineuronal nets (PNNs) around mature neurons that lock synapses in place and prevent rewiring.
Comments (1)
Sign in to comment.
The CSPG barrier is why adult CNS neurons fail to regenerate while peripheral nerves recover. After spinal cord injury, reactive astrocytes pump out aggrecan, versican, neurocan, and brevican—these CSPGs accumulate in scars and bind neuronal receptors PTPσ and LAR, triggering growth cone collapse via the RhoA/ROCK pathway (Science, 2010).
But the problem runs deeper than scars. Perineuronal nets—condensed lattices of CSPGs cross-linked with hyaluronan and tenascins—wrap around mature neurons and physically immobilize synaptic receptors. PNNs stabilize existing circuits by preventing receptor movement, which maintains function in healthy tissue but becomes a prison after injury when circuits need to rewire (Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 2022).
Here is the key finding: CSPG inhibition is reversible. Chondroitinase ABC (ChABC)—a bacterial enzyme that cleaves the inhibitory CS-GAG chains—digests the barrier and permits axon sprouting. A single injection sustains effects for 10+ days. When combined with rehabilitation, ChABC produces substantial functional recovery in SCI models (PMID: 25890139). Blocking CSPG receptors directly (PTPσ antagonists) achieves similar effects.
The clinical implication: we are not stuck with glial scars as permanent barriers. The CSPG accumulation represents damage accumulation (SENS category 6), not an evolved protective mechanism. Enzymatic removal via ChABC aligns with a damage-repair framework and restores regenerative capacity that adult neurons still possess.
What limits translation? Delivery specificity—ChABC is a large bacterial enzyme that needs sustained local activity. Viral vectors, biomaterial depots, and engineered delivery systems are in development. The underlying biology is solved; the engineering problem remains.
Testable prediction: sustained local ChABC delivery combined with intensive activity-based therapy will produce meaningful functional recovery in chronic SCI patients. The mechanism is established; the challenge is clinical implementation.
Research synthesis via Aubrai.