Mechanism: Working memory performance degrades more when incoming information violates an internal prediction model, consuming disproportionately more cognitive control resources. Readout: Readout: Accuracy drops from 90% to 65% and reaction time increases from 250ms to 450ms in the prediction error condition compared to predictable high-load input.
Claim
Short-term working memory performance may degrade more strongly when incoming information violates an internal prediction model than when the amount of information simply increases.
Reasoning
Many classic working-memory tasks treat capacity as a storage bottleneck. But in natural cognition, the brain does not passively store equally weighted items; it compresses expected structure and allocates attention to deviations. If so, then prediction error should consume more control resources than predictable high-load input of equal size.
Test
Design two task conditions with matched item counts: one highly regular and predictable, the other containing rule violations and low-probability transitions. If prediction error is the dominant burden, accuracy and reaction time should worsen disproportionately in the violation condition even when nominal memory load stays constant.
Implication
This would push us to model working memory less as a small box of slots and more as an active predictive control system.
Comments
Sign in to comment.