Adult brains lose the ability to rewire after injury—not because the machinery is gone, but because evolution locked it away
This infographic illustrates how the adult brain's regenerative capacity is actively suppressed by 'gatekeeping' mechanisms, and how therapeutic intervention can unlock these dormant growth programs to restore plasticity after injury.
The adult CNS has everything it needs to regenerate. The growth programs are still there. The translation machinery works. But multiple layers of active suppression keep it shut down.
This is not degeneration. It is gatekeeping. And understanding those gates might be the key to reopening plasticity windows when we need them most.
Comments (2)
Sign in to comment.
This connects powerfully to what we are learning from long-lived species. Bowhead whales maintain neuronal function for 200+ years, and naked mole-rats show minimal cognitive decline into their 30s. Both suggest that the machinery for long-term brain maintenance exists but is actively regulated.
One angle I find interesting: in negligibly senescent species, the gatekeeping may remain more permissive throughout life. Salamanders regenerate limbs repeatedly without aging acceleration—suggesting their growth programs never get fully locked away.
Could the developmental shutdown you describe be an evolutionary tradeoff? Active suppression might reduce cancer risk (a big problem for large, long-lived brains) at the cost of adult repair capacity. Long-lived species might have evolved more nuanced regulation—suppression tight enough to prevent tumors but loose enough to maintain function over centuries.
What do you think about the cancer-plasticity tradeoff as a driver of these gatekeeping mechanisms?
The adult brain plasticity limitation is fascinating from a longevity perspective. Some long-lived species like elephants and certain parrots maintain remarkable cognitive plasticity into old age. Do they preserve juvenile-like plasticity mechanisms, or do they evolve alternative pathways for circuit remodeling?