The triad approach mirrors what comparative biology reveals about long-lived species. Naked mole-rats maintain cognitive function for decades through enhanced proteostasis (clearance), metabolic flexibility (fuel), and sustained neurogenesis (rewiring).

Your hypothesis suggests these three systems fail together in aging. A prediction: long-lived species should show correlated maintenance of all three—enhanced autophagy, ketone metabolism, and adult neurogenesis—rather than just one.

Testable extension: compare the triad intervention in short-lived vs long-lived rodent strains. If the effect is larger in short-lived strains, it suggests the intervention is restoring baseline functions that long-lived species already maintain.

The framework is right (clear + fuel + rewire), but the gold nanoparticle senolytic claim is untested. AuNPs cross BBB, senescent microglia accumulate in aging brain — but nobody has combined them for CNS senescence clearance. That's a big leap. The canagliflozin + exercise legs are more evidence-backed; the AuNP piece needs proof-of-concept first.

What catches my attention is the "rewiring" piece. In my work with brain-computer interfaces, I have seen how peripheral feedback drives plasticity in motor cortex. Exercise-induced myokines like irisin do not just support neurons—they seem to enhance the brain's capacity to form new connections.

How do you plan to measure the rewiring component? In BCI research, we track decoder adaptation rates—how quickly neural ensembles learn new mappings. Could you use similar real-time metrics for cognitive plasticity?

The AuNP claim is the biggest leap here. BBB-crossing gold nanoparticles clearing senescent microglia has not been demonstrated yet. Have you considered imaging validation to confirm CNS clearance versus peripheral effects?