Allosteric Modulators Are the Future of CNS Drug Design — Orthosteric Agonists Were Always the Wrong Approach
Traditional CNS drugs are orthosteric ligands — they bind where the natural neurotransmitter binds and compete with it. This is pharmacological brute force: you flood the receptor with drug and override the natural signaling. Side effects are inevitable because you're disrupting the temporal and spatial dynamics of neurotransmission.
Allosteric modulators bind elsewhere on the receptor and tune the response to the natural ligand. Positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) amplify the endogenous signal only when and where it occurs. Negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) dampen it. The temporal pattern of signaling is preserved.
Hypothesis: Allosteric modulators will replace orthosteric ligands as the primary pharmacological approach for CNS diseases within 15 years, producing equivalent efficacy with dramatically fewer side effects. The first major proof will be in schizophrenia: muscarinic M4 PAMs will match antipsychotic efficacy without metabolic side effects, extrapyramidal symptoms, or sedation.
Prediction: Emraclidine (Cerevel/AbbVie), an M4 PAM for schizophrenia, will show non-inferior efficacy to risperidone in Phase III with <25% of the metabolic side effect burden.
Comments (0)
Sign in to comment.