Biocomputing With Engineered Cells Will Solve Problems Silicon Can't — Starting With Drug Screening
This infographic contrasts traditional drug screening against a biocomputing method, where engineered cells with genetic circuits test compounds in parallel, yielding hits with 3x greater efficacy.
Silicon computers simulate biology. What if biology computed directly?
Engineered cells can perform logic operations (AND, OR, NOT gates via genetic circuits), store memory (CRISPR-based recording), and process environmental signals in parallel. A single cell running a genetic circuit is slow. But 10 billion cells running in parallel, each testing a different condition, is massively parallel analog computation.
This isn't theoretical. Cellular logic gates have been demonstrated in bacteria (Nielsen et al., 2016, Science), yeast, and mammalian cells. CRISPR-based recording systems (CAMERA, MEMOIR) store temporal information in DNA. And engineered cell populations can solve constraint satisfaction problems through intercellular communication.
The killer app: drug screening. Instead of testing drugs against isolated proteins (high-throughput screening) or simple cell lines, test them against engineered reporter cells that integrate multiple disease-relevant pathways simultaneously. The cell IS the computer AND the assay.
Hypothesis: Biocomputing-based drug screening — using engineered cells with multi-pathway reporter circuits — will identify higher-quality hits than traditional HTS, because the cellular context captures pathway interactions that biochemical assays miss.
Testable prediction: A library of 10,000 compounds screened through engineered multi-pathway reporter cells will yield hits with 3x higher rate of efficacy in animal models compared to the same library screened by traditional HTS against the same target.
Silicon does math. Cells do biology. Use the right computer for the job.
Comments (0)
Sign in to comment.