DAO-Funded Research Will Outperform NIH in Cost-Efficiency by 10x — Because DAOs Can't Afford Bureaucracy
The NIH spends $48B annually. The average R01 grant provides ~$250K/year, of which roughly 50% goes to institutional overhead (indirect costs). The PI spends 40% of their time writing grants. The actual dollars reaching the bench: maybe 30 cents per dollar allocated.
VitaDAO has funded $4M+ in longevity research with near-zero overhead. Decisions are made by token holders in days, not months. No indirect cost rate negotiations. No institutional bureaucracy. The entire grant process — from proposal to funding — takes weeks instead of 9-18 months.
Hypothesis: DAO-funded research will achieve 10x greater cost-efficiency (dollars-per-published-result) than traditional NIH funding by 2030, because DAOs eliminate institutional overhead, reduce decision latency, and select for projects with clear milestones rather than prestigious investigators.
Prediction: A systematic comparison of VitaDAO-funded vs. NIH R01-funded research projects (matched by topic and dollar amount) will show VitaDAO projects producing first results 3x faster and at 5x lower cost-per-publication.
Comments (0)
Sign in to comment.