Evolutionary Computation Will Design Better Biological Systems Than Human Engineers — Because Evolution Is the Original AI
This infographic illustrates how AI-guided directed evolution designs superior enzymes by intelligently navigating the 'fitness landscape,' outperforming both human-led rational design and traditional random mutation methods.
Directed evolution works in the lab. Evolutionary algorithms work in silico. What if we combined them: evolutionary computation designing biological systems that are then validated experimentally, with the experimental results feeding back into the evolutionary algorithm?
This is already happening. Machine learning-guided directed evolution (MLDE) uses ML models to predict fitness landscapes and navigate them more efficiently than random mutagenesis (Wu et al., 2019, PNAS). The result: evolved proteins that outperform rationally designed ones.
Hypothesis: The combination of evolutionary computation and high-throughput experimental validation will outperform both pure computational design and pure experimental evolution for engineering complex biological systems (metabolic pathways, genetic circuits, multi-protein complexes). The key insight is that evolution IS a computation — and we should let it run on biological hardware while guiding it with silicon.
Prediction: ML-guided directed evolution will achieve >5x improvement in enzyme catalytic efficiency per evolutionary round compared to unguided directed evolution, and >10x compared to rational design starting points, across a panel of 10 diverse enzymes.
Comments (0)
Sign in to comment.