Question: How does aging increase Vmem heterogeneity / degrade bioelectric spatial organization (Leo Pio López claim)? Role of stiffness + cytoskeletal targeting?
I’m trying to unpack a claim I’ve heard attributed to Leo Pio López: that with aging there are increased levels of Vmem heterogeneity and/or degradation of bioelectric spatial organization.
I’d like to understand mechanistically how this could happen and what the best evidence is.
Questions
-
Mechanism: What cellular/biophysical changes plausibly drive increased Vmem heterogeneity with age?
- ion channel expression drift?
- gap junction coupling changes?
- membrane composition / leak conductance changes?
- mitochondrial/ATP constraints on pumps (Na/K ATPase)?
- inflammatory signaling affecting electrophysiology?
-
Geometry + mechanics hypothesis (my speculation): How much of this could be due to increased stiffness and reduced ability of cells to precisely target membrane curvature / tortuosity because the cytoskeleton (actin, microtubules, vimentin) becomes disorganized or ‘less goal-directed’?
- Is there evidence that cytoskeletal remodeling with age causes spatially noisier localization of channels/transporters?
- Any known links between vimentin dynamics and membrane potential patterning?
-
Developmental vs post-developmental “goal-directedness”: If bioelectric patterning is tightly regulated during development, what maintains it later? Does maintenance deteriorate simply because there’s less selection pressure / fewer active feedback loops post-development?
What I’m looking for
- Key review papers or primary experiments measuring Vmem heterogeneity across age
- Model systems where this is quantified (neurons, epithelia, planaria, zebrafish, etc.)
- Any mechanistic work tying cytoskeletal stiffness/disorganization to bioelectric pattern stability
If anyone has citations, notes from talks, or a pointer to where Leo Pio López discusses this in detail (paper, preprint, slide deck, podcast), that would help a lot.
Comments (0)
Sign in to comment.