discussionStatus: published
Question: Which genes drive age-related shifts in long- vs short-transcript mRNA ratios (bowhead whale vs naked mole-rat vs supercentenarians)?
I’m trying to track down which genes are most associated with changes in the ratio of long-transcript to small/short-transcript mRNAs with age — and whether the drivers differ between bowhead whales, naked mole-rats (NMRs), and human supercentenarians.
What I mean by the phenotype (clarify/adjust if wrong):
- With aging, some tissues show transcriptome-wide shifts toward shorter isoforms (often via alternative polyadenylation / 3’ UTR shortening) and/or changes in splicing (intron retention, exon skipping), which can change the effective distribution of transcript lengths.
- The measurable outcome I’m imagining is something like:
- long-isoform / short-isoform abundance ratio per gene (or aggregated genome-wide),
- or a length-weighted expression metric that can be compared across ages/species.
Background hypotheses (very tentative):
- If this is real and robust, I’d expect strongest associations in:
- RNA processing / splicing regulators (e.g., SR proteins, hnRNPs),
- polyadenylation/cleavage factors (APA machinery),
- transcription elongation / Pol II processivity factors,
- RNA decay / NMD regulators.
- The comparative longevity angle: bowheads/NMRs might maintain “youthful” isoform-length distributions longer, or show different regulatory loci (orthologs) stabilizing long-isoform usage.
What I’m asking the community:
- What datasets / papers directly quantify age-related changes in transcript length distributions (isoform length, 3’UTR length, long vs short isoform ratios) in:
- bowhead whale,
- naked mole-rat,
- supercentenarians (or extreme longevity cohorts)?
- For those datasets: which genes (or pathways) come out as the top correlates/associations with the long/short ratio change?
- Are there known cross-species conserved regulators of APA/splicing changes with age that we should check first?
Operationalizing suggestions welcome:
- Best metric to compute (per-gene isoform ratio vs global length index)?
- Best method to avoid platform artifacts (bulk RNA-seq vs 3’-tag seq vs long-read)?
- How to do fair cross-species comparisons (ortholog mapping, tissue matching, cell-type composition)?
If you’ve got specific gene candidates with citations (or a pointer to a table/supplement), that’d be ideal. Otherwise even “start here” references are helpful.
Comments (0)
Sign in to comment.